References

1. Johnston RC, Callaghan JJ, et al. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a single surgeon's experience. Orthop Clin Nor Amer 2001 Oct;32(4).
    
2. Data on file at WMT.
    
3. Data on file at WMT.
    
4. Data on file at WMT.
    
5. Data on file at WMT.
    
6. August  AC, et al. The McKee-Farrar hip arthroplasty. A long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg 1986 Aug;68(4):520-7.
    
7. McKee GK, Watson-Farrar J. Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee-Farrar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1966 May;48(2):245-59.
    
8. Wilson PD, Amstutz HC, Czerniecki A, Salvati E A, Mendes DG. Total hip replacement with fixation by acrylic cement. A preliminary study of 100 consecutive McKee-Farrar prosthetic replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 1972 Mar;54(2):207-36.
    
9. Amstutz HC, Grigoris P. Metal-on-metal bearings in hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996 Aug;(329 Suppl):S11-34.
    
10. McKellop H, Park SH, Chiesa R, Doorn P, Lu B, Normand P, Grigoris P, Amstutz H. In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. Clin Orthop 1996 Aug;(329 Suppl):S128-40.
     
11. Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Krygier JJ. Comparison of alloys and designs in a hip simulator study of metal on metal implants. Clin Orthop 1996 Aug;(329 Suppl):S148-59.
     
12. Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Tanzer M. The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop 1999 Dec;(369):10-24.
     
13. Poster #71. Nolan FJ, Farrar R, Schmidt MB, Phillips H, Tucker JK. Effect of head size and diametrical clearance on wear production of a new metal-on-metal hip prosthesis. 42nd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 1997.
     
14. Poster #1398. Bowsher JG, Nevelos J, Pickard J, Shelton JC. Do heat treatments influence the wear of large diameter metal-on-metal hip joints? An in-vitro study under normal and adverse gait conditions. 49th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 2003.
     
15. Schmalzried TP. Metal-on-metal: Historical perspectives and lessons learned through retrieval studies. Sem in Arthrop 1998;9:135-42.
     
16. Poster #1399. Varano R, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Yue S. Does alloy heat treatment influence metal-on-metal wear? 49th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society.  2003.
     
17. Doorn PF, Campbell PA, Worrall J, Benya PD, McKellop HA, Amstutz HC. Metal wear particle characterization from metal on metal total hip replacement: transmission electron microscopy study of periprosthetic tissues and isolated particles.  J Biomed Mater Res 1998 Oct;42(1):103-11.
     
18. Klapperich C, Graham J, Pruitt L, Ries MD. Failure of a metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty from progressive osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 1999 Oct;14(7):877-81.
     
19. Campbell P, McKellop H, Alim R, Mirra J, Nutt S, Dorr L, Amstutz HC. Metal-on-metal hip replacements-wear performance and cellular response to wear particles. In: Cobalt Based Alloys for Biomedical Applications. ASTM STP 1365. Disegi JA, Kennedy RL, editors. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 1999. 193-209.
     
20. Second International Conference on Metal-Metal Hip Prostheses. Testing issues in metal-metal tribology; 2003 Jun 22; Montreal. McKellop HA.
     
21. Second International Conference on Metal-Metal Hip Prostheses. Factors affecting wear in metal-metal hips: an overview of simulator testing; 2003 Jun 22. Isaac G, Hardaker C, Flett M, Dowson D.

Additional Articles of Interest

• McMinn D. Daniel J. History and modern concepts in surface replacement. Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 2006; 220 Part H: 239-251.2.
• Amstutz H. Le Duff M. Background of metal-on-metal resurfacing. Journal of Engineering in Medicine 2006; Vol.220 Part H:85-94.3.
• Amstutz H. Grigoris P. Metal on Metal Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 329S:.S11-S34.4.
• Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry Annual Report, 2007.5.
• Bohm, et. al. Long-term results with the Wagner metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prosthesis. Hip International 2006;16-2: S58-S64.6.
• Siebel, et. al. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations. Journal of Engineering in Medicine 2006;220 Part H: 345-353.7.
• Treacy R. et. al. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; Vol. 87-B, Issue 2:167-170.8.
• Cutts, et. al. Early failure modalities in hip resurfacing. Hip International 2005 Vol.15 No.3:155-158.9.
• Vendittoli, et. al. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old Hip International 2006; Vol.16 No.2:S73-S81.10.
• Pollard, et. al. Treatment of the young active patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) Vol 88-B, pp.592-600, 2006.11.
• Shimmin A. Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: A national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005;Vol.87-B, No.3:463-464.12.
• Pollard, Basu, Ainsworth, Bannister. Is the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing worthwhile? Hip International 2003; Vol.13 No. 1:25-28.13.
• Little, et. al. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; Vol. 87-B:320-323.14.
• Cossey, Back, Shimmin, Young. The nonoperative management of periprosthetic fractures associated with the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Procedure. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20- 3:358-361.15.
• Cummings, Fordyce. Case Report: Non-operative management of a peri-prosthetic subcapital fracture after metal-on-metal Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2003; 85-B, No.7:1055-6.16.
• Menge Seven years of experience in MoM resurfacing: results and open questions.11th Biolox Symposium Proceedings 2006, pp.23-30.
• Ravasi, Sirtori. Surgeon and resurfacing: considerations after a long experience. 11th Biolox Symposium Proceedings 2006, pp.31-37.
• Back et. al. How Do Serum Cobalt and Chromium Levels Change after Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; No.438:177-181.
• MacDonald S. Can a Safe Level for Metal Ions in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties Be Determined? J Arthroplasty 2004; Vol.19, No.8 Suppl. 3:71-77.
• Daniel et. al. The Effect of the Diameter of Metal-on-Metal Bearings on Systemic Exposure to Cobalt and Chromium. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) Vol.88-B:443-448.
• Clarke, et. al. Levels of metal ions after small- and large-diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2003; Vol 85-B, No.6: 913-917.
• Allan, et. al. Serum Cobalt and Chromium Elevations Following Hip Resurfacing With the Cormet 2000 Device. J Surg Orthop Advances 2007; Vol 16 No.1:12-18.
• Rieker C. et. al. Development and Validation of a Second-Generation Metal-on-Metal Bearing. J Arthroplasty 2004; Vol.19 No.8 Suppl. 3:.5-11.
• Dowson D. et. al., A Hip Joint Simulator Study of the Performance of Metal-on-Metal Joints, Parts I and II: J Arthroplasty 2004; Vol.19 No.8 Suppl. 3:.5-11.
• Amstutz A, Beaule P, Dorey F, LeDuff M, Campbell P, Gruen T. Metal on metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow up study. J Bone and Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28-39.
• Mont MA, Seyler TM, Marker DR, Marulanda GA, Delanois RE Use of metal on metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone and Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88 Supp 3:90-7.
• J. Lavigne M., Vendittoli P.-A., Roy A.G. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip. Girard J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88-B:721-6.
• Dela Rosa M., Silva M., Heisel, C., Reich M., Schmalzried T. Range of Motion After Total Hip Resurfacing. Orthopaedics 2007, No. 30:352.
• Bowsher J., Nevelos J., Williams P., Shelton J. “Severe” wear challenge to “as-cast” and “double heat-treated” large diameter metal-on-metal hip bearings. Proc. IMech E Vol.220 Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine:135-43, 2006.
• Cawley J., Metcalf J., Jones A., Band T., Scupien D. A tribological study of cobalt chromium molybdenum alloys used in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Wear, No.255: 999-1006, 2003.
• Vassilliou K., Elfi ck A., Scholes S., Unsworth A . The eff ect of “running-in” on the tribology and surface morphology of metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing device in simulator studies. Proc. IMech E Vol.220 Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine 2006: 269-77.
• Grigoris P. Roberts P. Panousis K. Jin Z. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: evolution of contemporary designs. Proc. IMech E Vol.220 Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine: 95-105, 2006.
• Chan F. Bobyn J. Medley J. Krygier C. Tanzer M. Wear and Lubrication of Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants. The Otto Aufranc Award. Clin Orth Related Research 1999; 369: 10-24.
• Luetzner J. Krummenaurer F. Lengel A. Ziegler J. Witzleb W-C. Serum Metal Ion Exposure After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orth Related Research 2007; e-publication.
• Zeh A. Planert M. Siegert G. Lattke P. Held A. Werner H. Release of Cobalt and Chromium Ions Into the Serum Following Implantation of the Metal-on-Metal Maverick-type Artificial Lumbar Disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek). Spine 2007; Vol. 32 No. 3: 348-52 .
• Dowson D. et.al. A Hip Joint Simulator Study of the Performance of Metal-on-Metal Joints. J Arthroplasty 2004;Vol.19, No.8, Suppl.3:124-130.
• Issac G. et. al. Metal-on-Metal Bearing Surfaces: Materials, Manufacture, Design Optimization, and Alternatives. Proc. IMechE Vol.220, Part H J. Engineering in Medicine 2006:119-133.
• Affatato S. et. al. Larger Diameter Bearings Reduce Wear in Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; No.456:153-8.
• Affatato S. et. al. Eff ect of Articulation Diameter on Wear Rates and Interface Temperatures. Poster #026, AAOS 2006.
• Kretzer J., Heisel C. Comparison of the macro- and microstructure of resurfacing hip implants. 6th Combined Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Societies, Honolulu, 2007.
• Jin Z., et. al. Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 1: experimental simulation. Proc. IMechE Vol.220, Part H J. Engineering in Medicine: 299-303, 2006.
• Tuke M. Taylor A. Design Considerations and Life Prediction of Metal on Metal (MoM) Bearings. Finsbury Orthopaedics Bulletin No. 047, 2005.
• Dowson D. Tribological principles in metal-on-metal hip joint design. Proc. IMechE Vol.220 , Part H J. Engineering in Medicine:161-71, 2006.
• Hing C. Young D. Dalziel R. Bailey M. Back D. Shimmin A. Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. A radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007;89-B (8):1019-24.
• Lilikakis A., Vowler S., Villar R. Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Implant in Metal-on-Metal Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum of Two Years Follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 215-22.
• Beaule P. Dorey F. LeDuff M. Gruen T. Amstutz H. Risk Factors Affecting Outcome of Metal-on-Metal Surface Arthroplasty of the Hip. Clin Orthop 2004; 418:87-93.
• Falez F. Favetti F. Casella F. Panegrossi G. Hip resurfacing: why does it fail? Early results and critical analysis of our first 60 cases. International Orthopaedics (SICOT), 2007.
• Vail T. Mina C. Yergler J. Pietrobon R. Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Compares Favorably with THA at 2 Years Followup Clin Orth Rel Res 2006; e-publication.
• DeSmet K. Belgium Experience with Metal-on-Metal Surface Arthroplasty. Orth Clin North Am 2005;36: 203-13.
• MacDonald S. et. al. Metal-on-Metal Versus Polyethylene in Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res, No.406:282-296.
• Harding et. al. Serum Levels of Cobalt and Chromium in a Complex Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty System. J Arthroplasty, Vol.17 No.7:893-895.
• Brodner et. al. Serum Cobalt Levels After Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am); Vol.85-A, No.11:2168-2173.
• Carroll et. al. Effect of Thermal Processing on Wear Performance of Large Diameter Hip Bearings. 17th Annual Symposium of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty”, 2004, Rome.
• McKellop H. et. al. Wear of Metal-on-Metal Large Diameter Articulating Couples. 27th Annual meeting of Society for Biomaterials, 339, 2001.
• Summary of Safety and Eff ectiveness, BHR, FDA website
• Bowsher, et. al. Wear of Heat treated and as cast large diameter metal-on-metal bearings. 49th Annual ORS meeting, Poster #1398.
• Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing TEC Executive Summary, 2007.
• Revell M. et. al. Metal-on-Metal Resurfacing in Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006;88:98-103.
• Mont M. et. al. Effect of Changing Indications and Techniques on Total Hip Resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, e-publication.
• Amstutz H. et. al. The Effects of Technique Changes on Aseptic Loosening of the Femoral Component in Hip Resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus With a 3 to 9 Year Follow-up. J. Arthroplasty 2007;22-4:481-9.
• Back D. Dalziel R. Young D. Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent prospective study of the fi rst 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004;87-B:324-9.
• Ball S. Le Duff M. Amstutz H. Early Results of Conversion of a Failed Femoral Component in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007; 89: 735-41.