References

1. Clinical Survey of Patient Satisfaction: A Study of Bilateral Knee Recipients. Data on file at Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
2. MedicineNet, Inc., 2005
3. Pinskerova, V; Iwaki, H; Kadoya, Y; Kobayashi, A; Nakagawa, S; Sakamoto, H; Todo, S; Yamano, Y; Brandsson, S; Karrholm, J; Freeman, MAR; Hill, PF; Vedi, V; Williams, A; Tibiofemoral Movement: Studies in the cadaveric and living knee using MRI, dissection and RSA, The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001.
4. Minoda, Yukihide, MD; Kobayahi, Akio, MD, PhD; Iwaki Hiroyoshi, MD, PhD; Miyaguchi, Masatsugu, MD, PhD; Kadoya, Yoshinori, MD, PhD; Ohashi, Hirotsugu, MD, PhD; Yamano, Yoshiki, MD, PhD; and Takaoka, Kunio, MD, PhD; Polyethylene Wear Particles in Synovial Fluid After Total Knee Arthoplasty, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 410, May 2003, pp. 165-172.
5. University of Washington School of Medicine
6. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):35-46.
7. K Hitt, et al. Anthropometric Measurements of the Human Knee: Correlation to the Sizing of Current Knee Arthroplasty Systems. JBJS 85:115-122 (2003).
8. Chin KR, Dalury DF, Zurakowski D, Scott RD. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2002 Fall;15(4):213-7.
9. Query on www.pubmed.com. Jan 4 2006.
10. Grelsamer et al. Men and women have similar Q angles: a clinical and trigonometric evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br.2005; 87-B: 1498-1501.
11. Garron E, et al. Anatomic study of the anterior patellar groove in the fetal period Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003 Sep;89(5):407-12.
12. Glard et al. An anatomical and biometrical study of the femoral trochlear groove in the human fetus. 2005. J Anat. Apr;206(4):411-3.
13. Sulaiman AS, Nordin S. Measurement of patellar thickness in relation to patellar resurfacing. Med J Malaysia. 2005 Jul;60 Suppl C:41-4.
14. Pritchett JW. Patient preferences in knee prostheses. J Bone and Joint Surgery (BR). 2004 Sept;(86-B): 979-982.
15. Eckhoff D, et al. Sulcus morphology of the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):23-8.
16. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):35-46.
17. K Hitt, et al. Anthropometric Measurements of the Human Knee: Correlation to the Sizing of Current Knee Arthroplasty Systems. JBJS 85:115-122 (2003).
18. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):35-46
19. Garron E, et al. Anatomic study of the anterior patellar groove in the fetal period Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003 Sep; 89(5):407-12.
20. Glard et al. An anatomical and biometrical study of the femoral trochlear groove in the human fetus. 2005. J Anat. Apr;206(4):411-3.
21. Eckhoff D, et al. Sulcus morphology of the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):23-8