Print Page Email to Friend

References

1. Clinical Survey of Patient Satisfaction: A Study of Bilateral Knee Recipients. Data on file at Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
2. MedicineNet, Inc., 2005
3. Pinskerova, V; Iwaki, H; Kadoya, Y; Kobayashi, A; Nakagawa, S; Sakamoto, H; Todo, S; Yamano, Y; Brandsson, S; Karrholm, J; Freeman, MAR; Hill, PF; Vedi, V; Williams, A; Tibiofemoral Movement: Studies in the cadaveric and living knee using MRI, dissection and RSA, The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001.
4. Minoda, Yukihide, MD; Kobayahi, Akio, MD, PhD; Iwaki Hiroyoshi, MD, PhD; Miyaguchi, Masatsugu, MD, PhD; Kadoya, Yoshinori, MD, PhD; Ohashi, Hirotsugu, MD, PhD; Yamano, Yoshiki, MD, PhD; and Takaoka, Kunio, MD, PhD; Polyethylene Wear Particles in Synovial Fluid After Total Knee Arthoplasty, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 410, May 2003, pp. 165-172.
5. University of Washington School of Medicine
6. Whiteside, L.A.: Cementless total knee replacement. Clinical Orthopœdics and Related Research 309: 185, 1994.
7. Stern, S.H., Insall, J.N.: Posterior stabilized prosthesis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 74A: 980, 1992.
8. Scuderi, G.R., Insall, J.N., Windsor, R.E., Moran, M.C.: Survivorship of cemented knee replacements. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 71B: 798, 1989.
9. Martin, S.D., McManus, J.L., Scott, R.D., Thornhill, T.S.: Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty 12: 603, 1997.
10. Andriacchi, T.P., Galante, J.O., Ferrier, R.W.: The influence of total knee replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 64A: 9, 1982.
11. Stiehl, J.B., Komistek, R.D., Dennis, D.A., Paxson, R.D.: Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 77B: 6, 1995.
12. Banks, S.A., Markovich, G.D., Hodge, W.A.: In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties. The Journal of Arthroplasty 12: 3, 1997.
13. Beight, J.L., Yao, B., Hozack, W.J., Hearn, S.L., Booth, R.E.: The patellar "clunk" syndrome after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopœdics and Related Research 299: 139, 1994.
14. Bartel, D.L., Bicknell, V.L., Wright, T.M.: The effect of conformity, thickness and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 68A: 7, 1986.
15. Plante-Bordeneuve, P., Freeman, M.A.R.: Tibial high-density polyethylene wear in conforming tibiofemoral prostheses. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 75B: 4, 1993.
16. White, S.E., Paxson, R.D., Tanner, M.G., Whiteside, L.A.: Effects of sterilization on wear in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopœdics and Related Research 331: 164, 1996.
17. Blunn, G.W., Joshi, A.B., Minns, RJ, Lidgren, L., Lilley, P., Ryd, LO., Engelbrecht, E., Walker, P.S.: Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties. The Journal of Arthoplasty 12: 3, 1997.
18. Hirsch, H.S., Lotke, P.A., Morrison, L.D.: The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopœdics and Related Research 309: 64, 1994.
19. Maloney, W.J., Schurman, D.J. The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopœdics and Related Research 278: 147, 1992.
20. Kujala, U.M., Österman, K., Lormano, M., Nelimarkka, O., Hurme, M., Taimela, S.: Patellofemoral relationships in recurrent patellar dislocation. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 71B: 788, 1989.
21. Eckhoff, D.G., Montgomery, W.K., Stamm E.R., Kilcoyne, R.F.: Location of the femoral sulcus in the osteoarthritic knee. The Journal of Arthroplasty 11: 163, 1996.
22. O'Connor, J.J., Shercliff, T.L., Biden, E., Goodfellow, J.W.: The geometry of the knee in the sagittal plane. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineering (Part H) Journal of Engineering in Medicine 203: 223, 1989.
23. Mensch, J.S., Amstutz, H.C.: Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement. Clinical Orthopœdics and Related Research 112: 231, 1975.
24. Freeman, M.A.R., Samuelson, K.M., Elias, S.G., Mariorenzi, L.J., Gokcay, E.I., Tuke, M.; The patellofemoral joint in total knee prostheses. The Journal of Arthroplasty 4(Suppl.): S69, 1989.
25. Mancinelli, C.A., Blaha, J.D., Simons, W., Kish, V.: The envelope of acceptable screw axes for the knee joint. Presented at the Thirteenth Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference, 1994.
26. Hollister, A.M., Jatana, S., Singh, A.K., Sullivan, W.W., Lupichuk, A.G.: The axes of rotation of the knee. Clinical Orthopœdics and Related Research 290: 259, 1993.
27. Mancinelli, C.A.: The instantaneous axis of rotation of the human knee joint. Doctoral dissertation, The University of West Virginia, 1994.
28. Chmell, M.J., Poss, R., Thomas, W.H., Sledge, C.B.: Early failure of HYLAMER acetabular inserts due to eccentric wear. The Journal of Arthroplasty 11: 3, 1996.
29. Sutula, L.C., Sperling, D.K., Collier, J.P., Saum, K.A., William, I.R.: Presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Orlando, FL, 1995.
30. Sutula, L.C., Collier, J.P., Saum, K.A., Currier, B.H., Currier, J.H., Sanford, W.M., Mayor, M.B., Wooding, R.E., Sperling, D.K., Williams, I.R., Kasprzak, D.J., Surprenant, V.A.: Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the hip. Clinical Orthopœdics and Related Research. 319: 28, 1995.
31. Wright, T.M., Bartel, D.L.: The problem of surface damage in polyethylene total knee components. Clinical Orthopœdics and Related Research 205: 67, 1986.
32. Engh, G.A.: Failure of the polyethylene bearing surface of a total knee replacement within four years. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 70A: 7, 1988.
33. Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Technical Monograph: DURAMER™ UHMWPE: The Wright approach to the polyethylene wear issues. MK416-296.
34. Arima, J., Nagamine, R., White, S.E., McCarthy, D.S., Whiteside, L.A.: The effect of five degree posterior slope of the proximal tibia on flexion in total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of two femoral component designs. Presented at the 61st Annual Meeting, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, 1994.
35. Todo, S., Kadoya, Y., Kobayashi, A., Yamano, Y., Moilanen, T., Freman, M.A.R. : Motion Analysis of the Femoral Condyles During Knee Flexion: An In Vivo MRI Study. Presented at the 44th Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, 1998, New Orleans.
36. Komistek, R., Walker, S.A.: An in vivo kinematic determination of the F/S 1000 medial pivot knee. Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Test Request TR97-0046, 1997.
37. Greenwald, A.S., Heim, C.S., Pastak, P.D., Tibial Plateau Surface Stress in TKA. Presented at the 65th Annual AAOS Meeting, 1998.
38. Wright Medical Technology Engineering Report, ER97-0059
39. S.G. Elias, M.D., M.A.R. Freeman, M.D., F.R.C.S., and E.I. Gokcay, M.D.: A Correlative Study of the Geometry and Anatomy of the Distal Femur. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research: 260, 1990.
40. Lotke PA. The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty: a commentary. University of Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Journal. Vol 12:109.1999
41. Blaha JD, et al. In vivo determination of kinematics for subjects having either an anterior cruciate ligament retaining or medial pivot total knee arthroplasty. Scientific Exhibit AAOS. 2002
42. Schmidt R, Blaha JD, Penenberg BL, Maloney WJ, Komistek RD, Fluoroscopic analyses of cruciate retaining and medial pivot knee implants. Clin Orthop 410:139-147. 2003
43. Wright Medical Technology Engineering Report, ER02-0007.
44. Wright Medical Technology Engineering Report, ER03-0081.
45. Wright Medical Technology Engineering Report, ER03-0080.
46. Wright Medical Technology Engineering Report, ER020004
47. Wright Medical Technology Engineering Report, ER010035
48. Wright Medical Technology Engineering Report, ER020005
49. Wright Medical Technology Engineering Report, ER010034
50. Pinskerova V, Iwaki A, Freeman MAR, The Shapes and Relative Movements of the Femur and Tibia in the Unloaded Cadaveric Knee: A Study Using MRI as an Anatomical Tool, Surgery of the Knee, Third Edition: Chapter 10, 2001.
51. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR, Tibio-Femoral Movement 1:The Shapes and Relative Movements of the Femur and Tibia in the Unloaded Cadaver Knee: Studied by dissection and MRI, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Br], 82B:1189-95, 2000.
52. Williams IR, Mayor MB, Collier JP, The Impact of Sterilization Method on Wear in Knee Arthroplasty, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 356: 170-180, 1998.
53. Palmer SH, Morrision PJ, Ross AC, Early Catastrophic Tibial Component Wear After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 350: 143-148, 1998.
54. Sathasivam S, Walker PS, Campbell PA, Rayner K, The Effect of Contact Area on Wear in Relation to Fixed Bearing and Mobile Bearing Knee Replacements, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 58, Issue 3: 282-290, 1998.
55. Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC, Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. A Minimum 15-Year Follow-up Study, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 367: 61-72, 1999.
56. Emerson RH. Head WC, Failure Mechanisms of Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: The impact of Changes in Operative Technique and Component Design, Seminars in Arthroplasty, Jan; 2(1): 23-28, 1991.
57. Marmor L, Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Ten to 13-Year Follow-up Study, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 226: 14-20, 1998.
58. Deshmuck RV, Scott RD, Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Long Term Results, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 392: 272-278, 2001.
59. M. Carroll, J. Moseley, S. Nambu, Knee Wear Testing Of ADVANCE® Medial-Pivot UHMWPE Tibial Bearings: Effects Of Material Selection, Manufacturing, And Sterilization Methods, 2005.
60. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):35-46.
61. K Hitt, et al. Anthropometric Measurements of the Human Knee: Correlation to the Sizing of Current Knee Arthroplasty Systems. JBJS 85:115-122 (2003).
62. Chin KR, Dalury DF, Zurakowski D, Scott RD. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2002 Fall;15(4):213-7.
63. Query on www.pubmed.com. Jan 4 2006.
64. Grelsamer et al. Men and women have similar Q angles: a clinical and trigonometric evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br.2005; 87-B: 1498-1501.
65. Garron E, et al. Anatomic study of the anterior patellar groove in the fetal period Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003 Sep;89(5):407-12.
66. Glard et al. An anatomical and biometrical study of the femoral trochlear groove in the human fetus. 2005. J Anat. Apr;206(4):411-3.
67. Sulaiman AS, Nordin S. Measurement of patellar thickness in relation to patellar resurfacing. Med J Malaysia. 2005 Jul;60 Suppl C:41-4.
68. Pritchett JW. Patient preferences in knee prostheses. J Bone and Joint Surgery (BR). 2004 Sept;(86-B): 979-982.
69. Eckhoff D, et al. Sulcus morphology of the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):23-8.
70. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):35-46.
71. K Hitt, et al. Anthropometric Measurements of the Human Knee: Correlation to the Sizing of Current Knee Arthroplasty Systems. JBJS 85:115-122 (2003).
72. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):35-46
73. Garron E, et al. Anatomic study of the anterior patellar groove in the fetal period Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003 Sep; 89(5):407-12.
74. Glard et al. An anatomical and biometrical study of the femoral trochlear groove in the human fetus. 2005. J Anat. Apr;206(4):411-3.
75. Eckhoff D, et al. Sulcus morphology of the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):23-8